Previous work #1: Literacy Narrative Analysis: Showcase Project for Professor Cripps’ ENG110
- Final essay project for ENG110
- Lacking a thesis
- WAY too much summary and hardly any of my own voice until the end of the paper – mostly seen in the conclusion
- Good use of textual evidence (not too many quotes and the quotes are useful)
Previous work #2: Podcast project for Professor Miller’s Writing Fellow Experience
- https://oliviacram.podbean.com/
- This podcast was CRINGE to listen to again..
- Hardly an intro
- Hardly any music
- You can hear me flip the pages in my notebook
- Really awkward pauses
- Not sure I even like the content of the podcast..
Previous work #3: Social and Natural Sciences Discourse Analysis for Professor Cripps’ ENG110
- WAY TOO MUCH SUMMARY!!
- Lacks thesis
- Overuse of block quotes
- Hardly understood what a “discourse” even was
- A ton of grammatical and spelling errors.. did I even proofread this??
- Could definitely make this paper SO much better
- I may even be able to connect these discourses to the discourses talked about in ENG330 Prize Fiction
